"There is nothing unusual about technology being used to protect intellectual property. You can't simply make an extra copy of a Microsoft operating system, or virtually any other commercially-released software program for that matter. Same with videogames. Movies, too, are protected. Why should CDs be any different? .......... The problem with the SonyBMG situation is that the technology they used contained a security vulnerability of which they were unaware. They have apologized for their mistake, ceased manufacture of CDs with that technology,and pulled CDs with that technology from store shelves. Seems very responsible to me. How many times that software applications created the same problem? Lots. I wonder whether they've taken as aggressive steps as SonyBMG has when those vulnerabilities were discovered, or did they just post a patch on the Internet? ........... One other thing to point out: The music industry has been more permissive about copying of its copyrighted product than virtually any other industry. How many burns are you allowed of a movie? None. How many of a videogame? None. You get the idea. Even the CDs with content protection allow consumers to burn 3 copies or so for personal use. The idea is not to inhibit personal use, but to allow personal use but discourage (not prevent, you can never prevent) copying well beyond personal use."
Ok, he's had his say, I'm gonna have mine. :-D
Fair point - you can't copy a M$ operating system, however it doesn't contain spyware and malware [although that last comment is a matter of opinion ;-)] or other 'features' that aren't included in the EULA [End User Licensing Agreement]. Microsoft do have the activation thing, but that is stated in the EULA and you know about that before you purchase the software. It's the same for DVDs - except you don't have to have proprietary software installed on your system and it doesn't affect your system by putting the DVD in your drive!
"Security vulnerability of which they were not aware" means they released it without considering the impact of their technology. In fairness, all software manufacturers have security vulnerabilities that are remedied in patches, however the patches do actually remove the risk, not simply create another as was the case for Sony BMG. Unfortunately for $ony, it's taken 3 weeks simply to get to this stage, and I think that that is an appalling time for a response. If a food recall is issued, it happens overnight. Why not the same admission of guilt from a Record Company?
The final point makes me mad. We're allowed to make 3 copies for personal use? Whoopdeedoo. iTunes lets us own 5 different copies, and it's cheaper, oh and by the way, it works with an iPod! :-D All this debacle has made me do is laugh. $ony has now released unprotect MP3 versions of their songs that used the XCP technology [and ultimately defeated the point of XCP!], replaced millions of CDs, and we're by no mean done yet. Lawsuits, and the MediaMax revelations are only just kicking off. I can't wait!



