Tuesday 30 May 2006 Filed in:
Rant of the WeekThe French are genuinely wonderful people. Most of the time. However,
the latest idea to flow from those free-thinkers the other side of the tranche really does make you wonder what is going through some of their politicians' heads. Firstly there was that wonderful law that would have removed iTunes from the French market. Brilliant - just what the people want. But now, having seen that AOL has teamed up with Brightmail for the dreaded two-tier internet, a French minister has decided that an email
and SMS tax would solve all problems with regards to the E.U.'s bloated budget. Now, the U.K.'s big budget rebate may be part of the problem, but I can think of many more problems that the E.U. ought to deal with before pointing the wagging finger at us. Like why every so often they move from Luxembourg to France. And then back again, just to keep the French happy. Now that I've bashed the French, back to this new proposal. Alain Lamassoure's proposal is guaranteed to make your life just a little more difficult, and yet more expensive. He wants users to pay a "tiny" tax of €0.15 (10p) on SMS text messages and €0.00001 on every email. Yes, 10p per SMS and a ten thousandth of a Euro on every email.
Firstly that charge on text messages is extortionate - and on top of the already inflated charges we pay for a single message. For an SMS you send (on average and without fancy EMS) 160 characters. I already pay 12p per text at a cost per character = 0.075p. For 22p per text, not only is Frenchie getting money from us, but we're paying nearly double per character.
Remember that for 12p a text, we're already being charged nearly 10p more than it costs the networks to carry messages from phone to phone! Now why is email so dramatically less? I can send an almost infinite number of characters for hardly any money.
Secondly, these charges would apply to everyone - consumers, businesses and, wait for it,
government departments! So, all those emails that Civil Sevants send will cost the government to send. Bizarre.
By this stage, you're wondering how on earth the 25 member states will be persuaded to sign up. I was too, until I read the last bit of the Guardian's article: "Say I send a text from Paris to Marseille, then the tax revenue would go to the French budget but if I sent a SMS from Brussels to London at least some of it would go to the EU. And messages sent outside the EU, to the US or Russia, say, could be used to help finance overseas development, ease hunger and poverty." I'm not going to counter the finance overseas and ease hunger and poverty. If this would help make a difference, I guess I could live with the charges - I'd simply send more emails thru a smart-device connected to 3G data. However, if money raised by local messages is going to the individual companies government, they're not going to veto it - even if the money ends up in the E.U.'s coffers eventually and not their own.
I'd like to think that even if you tried to circumvent the taxes (which would probably be highly illegal) the governments couldn't back-track you and ask for the taxes despite your efforts otherwise - all the government would do is try to squeeze the email provider hard enough, and voila, one eTax bill will land on your doorstop along with a hefty fine no doubt.
The reason I'm more than just pissed off with this is not just a knee-jerk reflex reaction. And it's partly to do with AOL's certified email (two-tiered internet) scheme. Whilst the E.U.'s proposal isn't Certified Mail-like (although a charging structure like this may prevent network clogging and enable faster SMS delivery!) I do object to this further opportunistic behaviour. "OOOh, email. We can make money on it somehow.". I recently answered a few questions for someone doing their degree dissertation. One of them was "If AOL proceed with their plans for Certified Mail, what impact do you expect it to have on you?" My response was: "Not a great deal - but the fact that it sets a precendent for others to follow means it would affect me more!" and that is exactly why I'm up in arms about this new idea. Once you can charge for guaranteed delivery, it wasn't going to be long before some idiot decided just to charge for current services.